Capture Your Collections
Small Museum Version
Legal Issues
Introduction and disclaimer
The purpose of this module is to examine the legal issues surrounding
the reproduction and digitization of heritage content. In particular, it will focus on the
law pertaining to copyright of digital photographs. However it is important to note that
this module does not examine the law pertaining to the exhibition, transmission or
communication to the public of digital images.
This module is written from the Australian and Canadian perspective and
provides only general information. Neither the Canadian Heritage Information Network
(CHIN) or Australian Museums On Line (AMOL) seek to provide legal advice through it. If
such advice is required it is strongly recommended that the services of a competent
professional, licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction should be sought. The
governments of Canada and Australia assume no liability whatsoever with respect to actions
that may arise as a consequence of using this guide, either by negligence or otherwise. As
such it is important for you to understand that any statements contained herein should not
be construed as being either the official or unofficial policy or statement of legal
position of any entity of the governments of Canada or Australia. They are simply broad
guidelines.
Copyright Law 101
Copyright protects the expression of ideas that are fixed in any media.
It also protects the majority of creations, including literary, dramatic, musical and
artistic works, sound recordings and audio-visual works. Ordinarily photographs are
considered to be artistic works and thus the author (photographer) is the copyright
holder. However this may not be the case where works are created in the course of an
employee's duties or where copyright has been assigned in writing to someone else.
See more information on Canadian rights, exceptions to copyright, rights management and protection technologies.
See more information on Australian Copyright legislation
and how it may impact on your digitization project.
Copyright licence
Before you digitize a work in your collection, it is advisable to
determine first whether you have the right to make the digital reproduction. It is
important to note that just because you may legally own an artwork, object, or photograph
and have a donor receipt, this does not necessarily mean you own copyright. The same can
be said of object loaned or copies of objects that you may have in your collection.
Because they are in your collection does not necessarily mean you own copyright to images
of them.
Below is a basic checklist that will assist in obtaining the
appropriate clearances. It is by no means exhaustive, and proper legal counsel should be
consulted to ensure that you hold all appropriate clearances before reproducing the work,
or the photograph of the work or compiling it into a database.
1. Does copyright exist:
The duration of copyright protection can differ from country to
country. In Canada and Australia, for instance, the general rule is that copyright
protection runs for the life of the author plus 50 years. In the United States and the
European Union, copyright protection runs for the life of the author plus 70 years. It is
also important to note that the laws of the country in which the copyrighted work was
created, should always be used to determine its copyright status.
2. Where the underlying work to be photographed/digitized is still
protected by copyright:
Before photographing and digitizing an image for which copyright is
still in existence, a museum should ensure that the work being photographed and then
digitized has been licensed for reproduction. Authorizations (in writing in Australia)
should be obtained from the artist/creator of the work that is to be photographed. The
authorization should include the purpose for reproduction, length of authorization and
number of copies required. In Canada where the work at issue falls in the public domain
(i.e. where the copyright no longer exists), then these authorizations are no longer
needed. For a comprehensive discussion, see CHIN's publication, Checklist for Licensing Museum Images, available on line or for
purchase in hard copy from CHIN. In Australia as of 4 March 2001 higher civil damages and
criminal penalties will be incurred where digitization is a factor in the infringement.
3. Where the photograph is still protected by copyright:
Since the digitization of an existing photograph is a reproduction,
museums should also ensure that they hold the rights to digitize the photograph. Such
rights can be obtained in two ways: by ensuring that the museum holds the copyright in the
photograph through an agreement with the photographer or by negotiating these rights when
the photograph is being subsequently digitized.
It is recommended that the right to reproduce the photograph be
expressly negotiated with the photographer at the outset, preferably in his/her freelance
contract. According to both Australian and Canadian law, any rights to reproduce the
photograph must be assigned by the photographer in writing. Where staff members of the
institution are photographing the work, that is, in-house in the course of their
employment, then pursuant to Canadian law, copyright in the photograph belongs to the
heritage institution. Where the photograph being digitized falls into the public domain,
then authorization is no longer needed.
4. Where the digitized image will be modified:
Where, in the course of digitization, the image is somehow modified --
either cropped or discoloured -- rights associated with copyright, such as moral rights,
will be an issue in Canada and soon in Australia. If you are considering the manipulation
or coloration of images, you should consider obtaining a waiver of moral rights from the
author of the image and any of the underlying works. If the author(s) does not wish to
grant the waiver, consider allowing the author to pre-approve any reasonable changes to a
work. For example, if an image of a work is being cropped or reduced in the course of
developing a Web site or virtual exhibition, the author may want to approve such changes
in order to protect the integrity of his or her work. In this case, the author will
probably retain the right to review the use of his/her work and provide a waiver in
writing after being satisfied that the work has not been mutilated, manipulated or
"destroyed" to his/her prejudice. If the work that is the subject of the image
or the photograph that is being digitized falls in the public domain, then the moral
rights of the artist/creator or photographer are no longer an issue.
Legal protection available
As a matter of course, all digitized images that are copyright
protected should have a copyright notice displayed somewhere on the image or below it, to
remind the viewer of the work's copyright status. Such notices commonly take the following
form:
Copyright © 2001, Name of Copyright Holder. All Rights Reserved.
If you place your digitized image on the Internet or include it in a
database where either a public or limited audience, such as via subscription, can view it,
you may want to include Rules of Use for your images. Where copyright law may fall short,
Rules of Use have become the common way of closing this legal gap. Rules of Use,
appropriately placed between the home page and subsequent pages of a Web site or virtual
exhibition, provide an implied contract with the visitor. In other words, if the visitor
to the Web site has no choice but to scroll through the rules before continuing to browse
through the Web site, then it is arguable that the visitor is bound by the rules as an
implied contract. The argument is strengthened where a click-through button is provided so
that the visitor can indicate whether he/she agrees or disagrees with the Rules of Use. If
the visitor disagrees with the terms, access to the content on the Web site is denied.
It is highly recommended that Rules of Use be established for any Web
site or virtual exhibition containing copyrighted digitized images. It is also recommended
that the Rules of Use contain contractual provisions acknowledging copyright protection
and conditions upon subsequent use or reproduction. For a thorough examination of Canadian
Rules of Use, consult CHIN's publication, "Protecting
Your Interests: A Legal Guide to Negotiating Web Site Development and Virtual Exhibition
Agreements", available online or for purchase in hard copy from CHIN.
Digital watermarking
If you intend using your digital images to produce high resolution (quality) images for a website or other digital products, you may wish to use specialized software to protect your image copyright. One of the most common ways to deter people copying your images without your permission, is to add a digital watermark to the images. This kind of technology is particularly useful if you intend placing images of contemporary artworks on your website where you may be required to protect not only your own museums copyright, but also the artists'. Also called digital finger printing, watermarking allows you to encode a subtle or not so subtle mark within your digital image files so that when copied the file cannot be altered or the mark removed. Depending on the technology used, this mark can include the name of the copyright owner or their logo. Be careful, digital watermarking software can be expensive and you need to carefully assess the real risk against the cost of implementing an effective solution.
Points to consider
Do you hold copyright for objects and the images you plan to digitize?
Have you consulted legal counsel regarding any issues pertaining to copyright on your
objects or images?
Are you aware of the moral issues related to cropping or otherwise altering images?
Are you planning to put a Rules of Use statement on your electronic image
database?
Do your Rules of Use precede viewing images?
|