Creating and Managing Digital Content Creating and Managing Digital Content

Capture Your Collections
A Guide for Managers Planning and Implementing Digitization Projects

Determining the Costs of a Digitization Project

Costs to consider
Digitizing images in-house vs. contracting out


Costs to consider


Whether digitizing in-house or contracting the work out, costs based on requirements as defined are associated with any digitization project. It is important to anticipate these costs and budget for them being realistic about expectations of ‘savings’ from the digitization of images. Management needs to expect initial costs based on the requirements determined in the project planning phase, but should also understand that long-term benefits are great; they include enhanced collections management documentation, preservation of original objects, enhanced information on museum intellectual property, allowance for public access, increased visibility for the institution, etc.34

Among the various constituents of total cost for a digitization project are the following:

  • Documentation,
  • Material or capital costs, including equipment, hardware and software, scanning equipment and image manipulation software,
  • Equipment costs for image capture, digital image storage, and maintenance of digital images,
  • Human resources; either hiring new or training existing staff,
  • Sufficient space and facilities for equipment and any necessarynew staff,
  • Transportation and handling of objects to be photographed or images going to an outside source (mainly for two-dimensional objects — costs will be higher for three-dimensional objects),
  • Insurance costs related to transportation,
  • Set-up time,
  • Photography and/or treatment of current photographs,
    Film processing and/or scanning,
  • Quality control,
  • Image manipulation, i.e., adjusting images for their intended purpose,
  • Ongoing maintenance.

It may also be helpful to consider possibilities for cost sharing with another institution as well as pooling resources for equipment and/or staff costs.

The largest expense will not be the actual scanning or photography, but the subject expertise required for documentation, locating, reviewing and assembling source material, preparing and tracking it, and quality control.35 On a project done in-house, these costs will take the form of training current staff, hiring new staff, and buying new equipment. It would be wise to investigate possibilities such as hiring interns or students from a community or technical college to do the image manipulation.36 Costs for a short-term project are determined by examining the hourly salary of each member of the team involved in the project. Adding tasks to a current staff member may add ‘stress’, and redistribution of work should be considered.37 A project that is contracted out will still require some staff training.

If photographs suitable for scanning are not available for all objects it is necessary to consider costs for preparation time, transportation of heavy objects, disbinding manuscripts, conservator checking of objects for damage, the photographic set-up, and the expertise required for all of these tasks.


Digitizing images in-house vs contracting out38, 39



IN-HOUSE

CONTRACTING OUT

 

ADVANTAGES

  • Learn by doing and develop in-house expertise
  • Build production capability
  • Retain control over all aspects of imaging
  • Some flexibility in defined requirements
  • Security of source material
  • Expertise and training of the digital service provider
  • Set cost per image, prices can be negotiated based on volume which facilitates budget and project planning
  • Lower labour costs
  • Costs of technological obsolescence are absorbed by the digital service provider
  • Limited risk
  • Variety of options and services
  • DISADVANTAGES

  • Larger investment
  • No set price per image
  • Need to set up technical infrastructure: space, digitization equipment, computers
  • Limits on production capabilities and facilities
  • Institution incurs costs of technological obsolescence
  • Impact on other activities
  • Institution pays for equipment, maintenance and personnel rather than for product
  • Need for trained staff, training
  • Equipment support
  • Museum removed one step from imaging functions
  • Possible inexperience with museum needs
  • Quality control not on site
  • Images will still need to be manipulated by museum staff. Random samples of the images produced should be conducted.
  • Needs must be clearly defined in contract or there will be communications problems
  • Transporting material — security and handling issues, especially with 3-D objects
  • Vulnerability due to instability of digital service providers (companies in business for over two years are considered viable)
  • If contracting out is decided upon, contract specifications for the digital service provider must be carefully defined, with a clear statement of the need for consistent results.40

    A possible compromise between the two approaches may be to hire a professional photographer to work on-site with museum staff.

    Obviously, the decision about whether to produce images in-house or by contracting out will be influenced by many factors, all part of the planning process. This is why it is important to have a realistic appraisal of the institutional situation.


    34Bramich and Cannon, p. 30.
    35Ester. p. 11.
    36Shaughnessy, Roxane. "Planning the Digitization of a Museum Collection." Ontario Museum Association Newsletter.September/October 1999.
    37Gosselin, p. 99.
    38Shaughnessy. An Approach, pp. 12-20.
    39Kenney and Rieger, Managing Digital Imaging Projects Course.
    40Wallace. Introduction to Image Digitisation for Museums.

    Table of Contents     Previous Page     Next Page


    Virtual Museum of Canada (VMC) Logo Date Published: 2002-04-27
    Last Modified: 2002-04-27
    Top of Page © CHIN 2008 All Rights Reserved
    Important Notices